[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Documentation suggestion: transposition resulting in triple accident
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: Documentation suggestion: transposition resulting in triple accidentals |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:03:05 +0000 |
Hello,
)-----Original Message-----
)From: Graham Percival [mailto:address@hidden
)Sent: 08 July 2011 15:56
)To: James Lowe
)Cc: Urs Liska; address@hidden
)Subject: Re: Documentation suggestion: transposition resulting in triple
)accidentals
)
)On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 02:33:07PM +0000, James Lowe wrote:
)> Hello
)>
)> )Therefore I'd suggest the following addition to the docs:
)>
)> Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1750
)
)... the mao?
)
)Screw the issue number, screw the patch. It's short, to-the-point, and it's
)only going inside @knownissuse. Just copy&paste into docs, check it still
)compiles, and push it.
)
)If this takes more than 120 seconds of your attention (i.e. not counting
)time when lilypond compiles in the background), you're doing it wrong.
)oh, also: you can check it compiles just with "make", you don't need
)"make doc" here.
)
Pushed as 70a015a514dd4af9e9aa7d643f8bbcb1e58c0a70
While I get your point Mr P, if I don't create an issue then it's 'all in
emails and then someone forgets to tell Carl (by email) who can backport this
and then I get hit by a bus and no one does the fix and so on. It is just
tidier to keep a tracker, I did intend to work on it straight away - I wouldn't
have bothered otherwise.
James