Re: 2.14.2

[Graham Percival]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:30:30PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >ick.  That means that they're floating around in the "issues to
> >verify" list, thereby confusing things for development.
> Do they really? After all they are "issues to verify".
> With this policy you can see the tag "verified_2_15_5" in the issues
> list and see it's halfway done.
> 
> But OTOH one could also argue to leave such issues completely
> unverified if you can't verify them completely.
> 
> What do you think?

I think all this energy could be directed at much more important
stuff.  I think that there's a lot of fuss about something which
doesn't matter.  The first 2.16 release candidate will be out in
2.5 weeks (if there's 0 critical issues).

It will probably take 1-2 weeks to fix those issues, unless we
make a "stable" release with known Critical Issues, we're looking
at releasing 2.14.2 approximately 7 days before the first 2.16
release candidate.  Woot?

Cheers,
- Graham