Re: Issue 1733 in lilypond: \displayLilyMusic ignores \tweak

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/24/11 4:12 AM, "-Eluze" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> If I run the command above with 2.15.5, I get the output at the bottom.
>> I'm not convinced that's correct.
>> 
>> Unbound variable: t
>> < \tweak #'transparent ##<unspecified> c e >
>> 
> an old question: should it be ##t or just #t?
> 
> a small example to illustrate the dilemma (from the NR) - emphasized by me:
> 
> Controlling tuplet bracket visibility
> The default behavior of tuplet-bracket visibility is to print a bracket
> unless there is a beam
> of the same length as the tuplet. To control the visibility of tuplet
> brackets, set the property
> 'bracket-visibility to either #t (always print a bracket), #f (never print a
> bracket) or
> #'if-no-beam (only print a bracket if there is no beam).

IMO, we should probably not list these in the text, but rather just show
examples.

But if we do list them, they should be #t, #f, 'if-no-beam.

#'if-no-beam is the only value in that section that has the # used to
introduce a scheme variable.




> music = \relative c'' {
> \times 2/3 { c16[ d e } f8]
> \times 2/3 { c8 d e }
> \times 2/3 { c4 d e }
> }
> \new Voice {
> \relative c' {
> << \music s4^"default" >>
> \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = #'if-no-beam
> << \music s4^"'if-no-beam" >>
> \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
> << \music s4^"#t" >>
> \override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##f
> << \music s4^"#f" >>
> }
> }


The example is correct.

Thanks,

Carl