[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suspended whole notes - possibly a defect, please give your opinions
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: suspended whole notes - possibly a defect, please give your opinions |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 23:20:44 +0100 |
2011/8/4 Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden>:
> That has been registered as issue #1774, isn't it?
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1774
Not quite. Gould makes an exception for semibreves with adjacent
notes; in this case, they should be aligned as if they had stems:
\version "2.15.9"
\new Staff \relative c' {
\cadenzaOn
\set Staff.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
\set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #all-invisible
\set Staff.instrumentName = #"LilyPond"
<f g>4 q1
<c' d e>4 q\breve
<<
{
<b c d>4 q1
<d e>4 q1
}
\\
{
<f, d c>4 q1
<b c>4 q1
}
>>
}
\new Staff \relative c' {
\cadenzaOn
\set Staff.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
\set Staff.explicitClefVisibility = #all-invisible
\set Staff.instrumentName = #"Gould, p. 50"
<f g>4 q1
<c' d e>4 q\breve
<<
{
<b c d>4 q1
<d e>4 q1
}
\\
{
<f, d c>4 q1
\once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1.4
<b c>4
\once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1.3
q1
}
>>
}
I can't see anything relevant in Stone; Read is a bit vague (but I
think he basically agrees with Gould on this).
Cheers,
Neil
adjacent-chord-poly.png
Description: PNG image