bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 1670 in lilypond: Allow numbers in variable names: violin1mvt2


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 1670 in lilypond: Allow numbers in variable names: violin1mvt2 = c'
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:42:22 +0000


Comment #10 on issue 1670 by address@hidden: Allow numbers in variable names: violin1mvt2 = c'
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1670

Fine modest proposal. But customHtuning is harder to read/type. I'd have chosen a different name, but to be fair: this variable is only used in the context of specifying a _Scheme_ expression not otherwise useful to Lilypond, namely as #custom-tuning. There _is_ a notable difference between #xxx and \xxx right now: if xxx is a music function, #xxx names it, but \xxx _calls_ it. And one needs the difference even when I continue on my quest of autoexporting Scheme expressions in every conceivable context:
zap=#somemusicfunction
zap=\somemusicfunction
need to stay different in meaning.

As another example of identifiers not generally useful as Scheme variables, take a look at scm/define-music-properties.scm. I don't particularly like the various different identifier syntaxes, though.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]