Re: Issue 2018 in lilypond: Patch: parser.yy: allow postevents in function arguments in general

[Graham Percival]

On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 03:53:03AM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> I don't particularly like "Patch-needs_work: Review has identified
> some problems" status when the only "problem" is that the patch is
> based (and consequently blocked) on another patch.

fine, I invented a
  Patch-waiting: Patch is blocked, but still needs review

I'm not convinced that 7 different patch levels is great; the more
labels we have, the harder it is to capture their status at a
glance.  But I agree that the previous situation was sub-optimal,
and I'm not interested in discussing any optimal solution at the
moment.

We can revisit this in GOP in 2012.

- Graham