Re: New read/eval Scheme syntax inconsistent in handling existing code

[David Kastrup]

Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:39 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> While the above example works fine now, when
>> using ly:parser-include-string, it is preferable to use $ to avoid
>> having your string getting injected _asynchronously_ after parser
>> lookahead (the above use is in a place without lookahead).
>
> Yes. I did figure that much.
>
>> A bug that made it through the reviews, nothing inherently bad about the
>> design.  Thanks for the test example, by the way.
>
> Yes, it looks probably a bit far-fetched but said bug did break all of
> my scores! (Hence the disruption thing.)

Valentin, any more news of bad effects on your scores?  Apart from the
bug that should now be fixed?

-- 
David Kastrup