[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 2190 in lilypond: Tuplet positioning on beamed notes is ugly
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 2190 in lilypond: Tuplet positioning on beamed notes is ugly |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:40:36 +0000 |
Comment #1 on issue 2190 by address@hidden: Tuplet positioning on
beamed notes is ugly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2190
I don't think that all tuplets should be outside of the staff. Here's how
i'd place them.
Does anyone have nicely engraved real-world examples?
\markup { Here is how beamed quaver tuplets look now; ugly, with some
colliding
with the staff lines: }
\relative f' {
\times 2/3 { f8 f f }
\times 2/3 { e e e }
\times 2/3 { d d d }
\times 2/3 { c c c } % All lower notes are the same as this;
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\times 2/3 { f f f }
\times 2/3 { e e e }
\times 2/3 { d d d }
\times 2/3 { c c c }
}
\markup \wordwrap { Here is how they should look in my opinion. Perhaps
TupletNumbers lying between the lines should have bigger and/or slanted
whiteout. }
\relative f' {
\override TupletNumber #'whiteout = ##t
\times 2/3 { f8 f f }
\tweak #'padding #1.60 \times 2/3 { e e e }
\once \override TupletNumber #'Y-offset = #2
\times 2/3 { d d d }
\once \override TupletNumber #'Y-offset = #1.5
\times 2/3 { c c c }
\override TupletBracket #'bracket-visibility = ##t
\times 2/3 { f f f }
\tweak #'padding #1.6 \times 2/3 { e e e }
\tweak #'padding #1.8 \times 2/3 { d d d }
\tweak #'padding #1.2 \times 2/3 { c c c }
}
\markup { I'd make them exactly the same in case of unbeamed notes. }
Attachments:
tuplets by Janek.pdf 43.8 KB