Re: Wrong placement of BreathingSign

[address@hidden]

On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, James wrote:

> hello,
> 
> On 9 January 2012 11:55, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
>> With "2.14.2" and "2.15.2" the BreathingSign isn't positioned correct,
>> while using changed staff-size or (default) TabStaff.
>> 2.12.3-behaviour was accurate.
>> 
>> %\version "2.12.3"
>> \version "2.14.2"
>> %\version "2.15.20"
>> 
>> mel = { c'1 \breathe }
>> 
>> \score {
>>       <<
>>       \new Staff\with {
>>               fontSize = #-4
>>               \override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -4)
>>               \override StaffSymbol #'thickness = #(magstep -4)
>>       }
>>       \mel
>> 
>>       \new Staff
>>       \mel
>> 
>>       \new TabStaff
>>       \mel
>>>> 
>> }
>> 
> 
> Added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2205
> 
> @devs
> 
> Not sure if this is a 'critical', as while it is a regression, it is
> the same in current stable as it is in current dev (i.e. it was 'ok'
> in 2.12 but never was, it seems in 2.14).
> 
> So someone else needs to make that judgement if this blocks release or
> not and change the tracker accordingly

My vote is for making it critical - I think a regression from any stable 
version is a critical regression.  I don't think it's worth making a 2.14.X 
that includes a fix, but the regression should block 2.16.

Cheers,
MS