[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wrong placement of BreathingSign
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: Wrong placement of BreathingSign |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:12:08 +0000 |
Hello,
On 9 January 2012 13:04, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:24:42PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> > Not sure if this is a 'critical', as while it is a regression, it is
>> > the same in current stable as it is in current dev (i.e. it was 'ok'
>> > in 2.12 but never was, it seems in 2.14).
>>
>> My vote is for making it critical - I think a regression from
>> any stable version is a critical regression. I don't think it's
>> worth making a 2.14.X that includes a fix, but the regression
>> should block 2.16.
>
> Umm, why don't we just follow the policy?
Quite
> A critical regression
> is anything that broken in the previous two major stable versions.
> We are now working on 2.15, so any regression relative to 2.14 or
> 2.12 is critical. Regressions from 2.10 are not critical.
That was my mistake, I was sure it was one major stable.
regards
--
--
James