Re: Issue 2263 in lilypond: Reimplement chord repetition

[David Kastrup]

Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 06:34:16PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> address@hidden writes:
>> 
>> > Amusingly, apparently somebody added code to handle the < > bits, but
>> > not the URL: part.
>> 
>> Both forms are in use, but I thought the URL: form was, stupid as it
>> looks, more or less considered "correct" in mails.
>
> As an aside, mutt doesn't handle those nicely...
>
> ... but more importantly: the form of url that patchy expects is
> exactly the form that our forked git-cl uses.  If you choose to
> upload commits without using our forked git-cl, these problems may
> arise.

Our forked git-cl for whatever reason decided to create a new review
(probably something went foul when juggling with branches and resets and
renames).  I don't know why Patchy did not pick up the URL info
afterwards: I did a copy&paste job of the last automated comment
delivered to 1110, and in issue 2263, Patchy had no problems picking it
up.  Maybe one has to change the Description instead of mentioning
changed links in the comments?

-- 
David Kastrup