|
From: | lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Issue 2343 in lilypond: Faulty file-naming when outputting multiple \books |
Date: | Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:30 +0000 |
Comment #10 on issue 2343 by address@hidden: Faulty file-naming when outputting multiple \books
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343Ian, the patch does not change the use of "output-suffix". As long as you don't declare a book specific suffix with \bookOutputSuffix (or an assignment to book-outputsuffix or book-filename in a \paper block), the old usage will work as before.
Would it make sense to use the paper variables output-suffix and, uh, output-filename instead? Looks redundant to have "book-" in the variable name, and, after all, there seems little wrong with just declaring
\book { \paper { outputsuffix = "xxx" } }
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |