bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 2148 in lilypond: vertical skylines should use stencil integra


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: Issue 2148 in lilypond: vertical skylines should use stencil integrals
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:11:13 +0000


Comment #83 on issue 2148 by address@hidden: vertical skylines should use stencil integrals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2148

markup-note-dot.ly is, in my opinion, an improvement, as the dot of the whole note was uncomfortably close to the half note. figured-bass-implicit is an interesting case: Before, the "p" of implicit shifted the whole markup up whereas now it fits between two figured bass symbols. One way to fix this is to make the vertical-skylines for BassFigureLine simpler so that they can't be interlocked with the vertical axis group above or below. I'd be interested in hearing from a figured bass expert, but this'd likely be a separate commit.

All of the changes in sizeX come from an interesting phenomenon with the forte glyph. The cozy spacing in the original sizeX.ly regtests comes from the fact that the bounding box is set to be smaller than the actual glyph. This results in almost-collisions between cantabile and forte. In my newest patchset, the outside-staff-horizontal-padding pushes cantabile to the outside of forte. If you change the word to "liedhaft", the problem goes away.

It's a matter of taste if people like objects so closely spaced. One way to achieve this in the current model is to use horizontal skylines in add_grobs_of_one_priority instead of the Skyline::left () and Skyline::right () to determine bounds. But this'd definitely be another patch. For the moment, for me, it's not a game breaker.

I don't think transparency is having an impact anymore.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]