Re: Issue 2148 in lilypond: vertical skylines should use stencil integrals

[address@hidden]

On Mar 1, 2012, at 4:12 PM, address@hidden wrote:

> 
> Comment #90 on issue 2148 by address@hidden: vertical skylines should use 
> stencil integrals
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2148
> 
> If transparency is not supposed to have an impact anymore, why do we still 
> have different callbacks for "maybe-transparent" stencils even in the latest 
> iteration?  If this is dead code, it should be removed.  There should only be 
> one callback, and it should not look at transparency.
> 

Because I haven't pushed my tabVoice code yet.  It doesn't have an impact in 
the regression tests you're talking about, but it would have an impact in all 
of the tab regtests.  Once I push the tabVoice patch, I'll be able to get rid 
of this code.