|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: unexpected accidental following cadenza |
Date: | Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:55:26 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Bobroff <address@hidden> writes: > I got a surprise when a cancelling accidental was printed at the > beginning of a measure. This happened following a cadenza. Short > example below: > > > %%% > \version "2.14.2" > > \relative c' > { > \key c \major > \cadenzaOn > fis4 g a b > \cadenzaOff > \bar "|" > f > } > %%% > > Is this a bug? Don't think so. \cadenzaOn switches off all timing (which is the whole idea behind it). Your whole example does not leave bar 1. The manual bar line does not change that. You can probably write something like << { \cadenzaOn fis4 g a b \cadenzaOff } \\ s1 >> if you want timing to continue. Incidentally: your example does not look like a cadenza at all. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |