Re: Key_signature_engraver unknown

[James]

Hello,

On 13 March 2012 22:39, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Eluze, you wrote Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:22 PM
>
>
>> why is the Time_signature_engraver not called Time_engraver  - or what
>> rules
>> are used in constructing names?
>
>
> I don't know.  These names were first devised almost 10 years ago,
> well before I discovered LilyPond.  But one possibility is because one
> often uses "key" and "key signature" interchangeably when talking
> loosely, but one never hears "time" as an alternative to "time signature".
>
>
>> I'm not sure about making this an issue…
>
>
> James likes to have issues raised for doc changes,

I do only because I can (and do) miss the email requests for doc
enhancements - my inbox is full enough as it is trying to keep up with
potential snippets and/or general doc improvements. Tracker numbers
are cheap. I also tend to batch-fix all the small requests in one
'sitting' this is a much more efficient use of my time.

Anyway, this is now pushed to staging. Should be in 2.15.34

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=c69a9437979b012b766f94ef4ec45f9c2eac645d


-- 
--

James