bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: transpose fails to transpose the pitchedTrill notehead


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: transpose fails to transpose the pitchedTrill notehead
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:11:04 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Arnold <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>>> I'm not top posting.
>>>
>>> Hello, the trill note head (resp. pitch) of a pitchedTrill is no longer 
>>> transposed (as in 2.14.2).
>>> Tested on a Win7/64 Computer.
>>>
>>> \version "2.15.36"
>>> { \transpose c as' { \pitchedTrill e'4\startTrillSpan fis'
>>> r\stopTrillSpan } }
>>
>> New issue 2484
>> Patch: Let pitched trills in articulations be transposed as well
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2484
>>
>> It turns out that the example file
>> \version "2.15.34"
>> \new Voice
>> { \transpose c as' { \pitchedTrill e'4\startTrillSpan fis' r\stopTrillSpan }
>>                    { \pitchedTrill e'4\startTrillSpan fis' r\stopTrillSpan }
>> }
>>
>> still gives a strange result with the fix applied: the first trill pitch
>> gets an explicit natural accidental even though this would be part of
>> the surrounding key signature.  Removing \pitchedTrill, \startTrillSpan,
>> and \stopTrillSpan does not result in similar spurious accidentals, so
>> it would appear to be an artifact of the pitched trill code.
>>
>> This is a separate issue, however, and in contrast to your issue not
>> likely a regression.
>
> And not related to transposition:
>
> \version "2.15.34"
> \new Voice
> { \pitchedTrill c''4\startTrillSpan d'' r\stopTrillSpan }
>
> is sufficient for getting an unneeded natural here.  Huh.

<URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=524#c6>

The question

    "What does Gardner Read have to say about pitched trills for natural
     notes, if anything?"

has not been addressed as far as I can see.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]