Re: TupletNumber regression

[-Eluze]

John David Duncan-3 wrote:
> 
>> I'm not top posting.
> 
> The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good
> placement 
> in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38.
> 
> JD
> 
> 
> \language english
> 
> %%%%  Score begins here
> \parallelMusic  #'(pianoRH dynamics  pianoLH) {
> 
> % Measure 9
> <<  { \stemDown df''2\arpeggio s2 } \\
>       { \stemUp \times 2/3 { g''8[ af'' c'''] }  df'''8 f''' 
>       \ottava #+1 
>       \times 2/3 { <g'' g'''>8 \( <af'' af'''> <g'' g'''> \) }
>       \times 2/3 { <f'' f'''>  \( <df'' df'''> <f'' f'''> \) }
>       \ottava #0 } >> |
> s1\f | 
> \clef bass <df af f'>2\arpeggio \clef treble <af' f''>2   |
> 
> 
> % End of Music
> }
> 
> \score {
>       \new PianoStaff
>       <<
>         \set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t
> 
>         \new Staff = "RH" \with { \consists "Page_turn_engraver" } \pianoRH
>         \new Dynamics \dynamics
>         \new Staff = "LH"   \pianoLH
>       >>
> 
>   \layout { }
> }
> 
> 

it is recommended to use \voiceOne, \voiceTwo … because \stemUp or \stemDown
only affect the direction of the stems (and no other properties)

hth 
Eluze
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/TupletNumber-regression-tp33890750p33892761.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.