[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: retrograding with convert-ly
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: retrograding with convert-ly |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:50:25AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Colin Hall <address@hidden> writes:
> > C:\colin\programs>more bug.ly
> > \version "2.15.41"
> >
> > C:\colin\programs>"c:\Program Files
> > (x86)\LilyPond-2.15.41\usr\bin\convert-ly.py" bug.ly
> > convert-ly.py (GNU LilyPond) 2.15.41
> >
> > convert-ly.py: Processing `bug.ly'...
> > Applying conversion:
> >
> > \version "2.15.40"
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are aware that without the -e option, the file itself is not
> modified, but instead the converted output is written to stdout?
Clearly not!
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, (continued)
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Colin Hall, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, Graham Percival, 2012/07/15
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, David Kastrup, 2012/07/16
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly, -Eluze, 2012/07/17
- Re: retrograding with convert-ly,
Colin Hall <=