[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug? with Choir Staff
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: bug? with Choir Staff |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:45:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Aaron Laws <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestions and repro effort.
>>
>> The original printing (and viewing) was from Adobe Acrobat (pro) 9.
>> Lilypond "\version 2.12" (I think), Windows. I just used Sumatra pdf
>> viewer, and it looks a good deal different. I printed, and the first one
>> looks like in Adobe, but the second system looks perfect. The barlines look
>> perfect on the *first* system in sumatra, and the second system looks about
>> like adobe... The staff lines look inconsistent in Sumatra (some thin here
>> and there). Basically, Sumatra is inconsistent, sometimes right and
>> sometimes wrong, and Adobe is consistently wrong (except staff lines;
>> exquisite).
>
> just FYI, the barline problem was fixed in 2.15.10 (commit
> b92ea16ef75d8aaa7bdb9f492b58d7af906e7945).
While it will likely catch most uses, bar_line_color == staff_color is
mixing C operators and only compares for strict eq-equivalence. It
might make more sense to write
ly_is_equal (bar_line_color, staff_color)
here instead.
--
David Kastrup
- bug? with Choir Staff, Aaron, 2012/08/21
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/08/21
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Colin Hall, 2012/08/21
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Xavier Scheuer, 2012/08/22
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Aaron Laws, 2012/08/22
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Colin Hall, 2012/08/23
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, David Kastrup, 2012/08/23
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Aaron Laws, 2012/08/23
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/23
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, Janek Warchoł, 2012/08/23
- Re: bug? with Choir Staff, David Kastrup, 2012/08/30