[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR is not at the stable release level
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: LSR is not at the stable release level |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:40:57 +0100 |
Hello,
On 2 October 2012 17:24, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 06:21 PM, James wrote:
>>
>> So without the snippet log I cannot really tell, but it doesn't look
>> that clean to start with. Maybe someone else can care comment?
>
>
> Do you have any remarks on the suspicion given in the bugtracker that it's
> because of the very large amounts of memory required to build Lilypond (most
> likely lilypond-doc rather than LP itself)?
Well unless they are using 1GB of RAM, I personally have not had any
problems with 2GB or RAM. So I'd find it hard to believe it was RAM.
James
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, (continued)
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Eluze, 2012/10/03
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/03
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, James, 2012/10/04
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Eluze, 2012/10/04
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/04
- Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Thomas Morley, 2012/10/04
Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/02
Re: LSR is not at the stable release level, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/02