Re: LSR is not at the stable release level

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 10/02/2012 06:40 PM, James wrote:
> Well unless they are using 1GB of RAM, I personally have not had any
> problems with 2GB or RAM. So I'd find it hard to believe it was RAM.

AFAICS they're not building it on local machines but on automated server 
systems, possibly on cloud-based virtual servers, so they might well have less 
RAM than you'd expect.

Or, they might just have set an artificially low memory threshold on the grounds 
that no package should be using this much memory just to build.