[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable
|
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
|
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level] |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Oct 2012 23:57:22 +0200 |
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Colin Hall <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > perhaps it's worth subscribing bugs-lilypond to trackers for the major
> > distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, etc.) so that the development team at least
> > gets alerted to the issues out there?
>
> bugs-lilypond is for receiving reports against the code we release.
Not quite. bug-lilypond is for things that we should know about and
act upon - apart from lilypond bugs this includes publications made
with LilyPond (that should be listed on website) and similar things.
cheers,
Janek
- Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/02
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/02
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Graham Percival, 2012/10/03
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/10/03
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/03
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Graham Percival, 2012/10/03
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/10/03
- Re: Lilypond and distribution bugtrackers [was: LSR is not at the stable release level], Graham Percival, 2012/10/03