[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grace note articulation
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: grace note articulation |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 05:29:22 +0000 |
Hello,
On 24 December 2012 18:12, Zefram <address@hidden> wrote:
> James wrote:
>>Your choice, you don't have to have a gmail account, just a login to reitveld.
>
> How do I acquire a Rietveld account that won't be linked to any other
> application?
>The website says "sign in with your Google Account", and
> doesn't make any mention (that I see) of any other kind of account.
huh?
https://codereview.appspot.com/6868063/
for example, he (our most prolific dev) doesn't use a gmail account.
> (Gmail is merely one example of another application that uses Google
> Accounts, and not a relevant one for me, because I have a proper email
> service and so no reason to use web-based mail.)
>
>>> If there's some version of this process that I can drive
>>> from the command line
>>
>>I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> See your documentation at <http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/
> Documentation/contributor/commits-and-patches#uploading-a-patch-
> for-review>, and at Documentation/contributor/source-code.itexi in git.
> There's a section titled "Uploading patch set", which describes using
> git-cl. That bit's fine, modulo establishing a Rietveld account.
> Then there's a section titled "Announcing your patch set", which says
> that it's necessary to use the Rietveld website to send a notification
> of the uploaded patch to the developer mailing list, because there's no
> automatic notification. That bit's a problem.
Why?
>
> Your description of the process seems to indicate that actually
> a notification of the patch *is* automatically sent. The fact that
> git-cl asks for a config setting whose value is <address@hidden>
> suggests the same thing. So is the "Announcing your patch set" doc
> section incorrect/obsolete?
Submit a patch to fix that.
James