bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: overloaded example for dampened notes


From: Federico Bruni
Subject: Re: overloaded example for dampened notes
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 18:26:10 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121123 Icedove/10.0.11

Il 25/12/2012 11:25, Eluze ha scritto:
>  I've created a tracker for this documentation enhancement here:
>
>  http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3064
… and it has already been declared as invalid - let me try to summarize what
I don't like with this example:

(a) the three chords are nearly not playable

I agree with you here (for the first two chords) and I think that it's the only relevant problem in this example.

(b) the dampened notes (c-d-e) between two sounding notes are ridiculous

They are not ridiculous. What is wrong is the choice of the notes to be muted, as I've already pointed out in my previous message.

(c) the string numbers should only be set once (if at all)
(d) the placement of the number for the 3rd string below the staff is quite
unusual


Most of the string number indications in that example is not required (only three are required to display TabStaff correctly).
I would just removed them with an override.

I've already asked above for a real example from guitar literature - if
there's none I don't think LP should invent such things; if there are, one
of them could be used in the doc (if it's suitable and not copyrighted)

Octave chords, as Marc wrote in the tracker.

Find attached a revised example, including the diff.
What do you think about it?
--
Federico

Attachment: dampened-notes.diff
Description: Text Data

Attachment: dampened-notes-new.ly
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]