Re: LSR 199 has 2 tuplet numbers since 2.15.7

[Eluze]

Phil Holmes-2 wrote
> It's taken me a while to work out what's going on here, but it looks like 
> it's caused by an incorrect assumption in the snippet, and a change in 
> behaviour from \stemDown.
> 
> The incorrect assumption in that \stemDown isn't needed - it is.  The red 
> notes are placed in an automatic 3rd voice, which has stems up by default. 
> Therefore, by default the tuplet numbers are above the notes.  In 2.14, 
> stemDown also moved the tuplet numbers, and so the \stemDown command put
> the 
> red tuplet numbers below the notes.
> 
> This behaviour has changed (I've not tracked why) and stemDown now only 
> alters the stems.  So the red notes are forced to be stem down, but the 
> tuplet numbers remain above the notes - hence double numbers above the 
> notes.  It can be corrected by using \voiceFour instead of \stemDown.
> 
> FWIW I think \stemDown should not move the tuplet numbers.

thanks for the quick resolution, Phil! (and I also think \voiceTwo/Four
would be better)
and thanks for adding a tracker to remember, Colin!
Eluze



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LSR-199-has-2-tuplet-numbers-since-2-15-7-tp139306p139335.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.