Re: changing flag style/stencil should affect metronome mark, shouldn't it?

[Colin Hall]

Colin Hall writes:

> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>> Hi Colin,
>>
>> I see three bugs

I have created two additional trackers, see links in line below.

>> (1)
>> The markup-commands \note-by-number and \note don't support other
>> flag-styles than default.
>>
>> This will result in ugly output.
>> I'd consider this of type: enhancment.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> \version "2.17.9"
>>
>> \markup {
>>         \override #'(style . mensural)
>>         {
>>                 \note-by-number #3 #0 #1
>>                 \note #"8" #1
>>         }
>> }

See tracker 3104 for (1) above.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3104


>> (2)
>> `format-metronome-markup' and `metronome-markup' from
>> /scm/translation-functions.scm don't support other note/flag-styles
>> than default.
>> (Even if \note-by-number would support them.)
>>
>> (Can't imagine an example)
>>
>> This is part of the problem Karol reported initially.
>> I'd consider this of type: enhancment.

See the tracker I created a few days ago which I have re-titled to
assign it to (2) above.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3096



>> (3)
>> In mensural-style the stem and flag aren't well combined.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> \version "2.17.9"
>>
>> {
>>  \override Flag.style = #'mensural
>>  \override Stem.thickness = #1.0
>>  \override NoteHead.style = #'mensural
>>  c'8
>> }
>>
>> I'd consider this of type ugly.
>

For this last bug, see tracker 3105.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3105

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 
Colin Hall