[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Positioning of "8" under clef symbol in G_8 clef
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: Positioning of "8" under clef symbol in G_8 clef |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:39:05 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.5-dev6; emacs 23.3.1 |
David Kastrup writes:
> Colin Hall <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Phil Holmes writes:
>>
>>> "Nick Payne" <address@hidden> wrote in message
>>> news:address@hidden
>>>> The default positioning of the small "8" under the clef symbol when
>>>> using the treble_8 or G_8 clef is too far to the right. It looks better
>>>> when the X-offset is about 0.7 staff units:
>>>>
>>>> %============
>>>> \version "2.17.10"
>>>>
>>>> \relative c'{
>>>> \clef "G_8"
>>>> \override Staff.OctavateEight.X-offset = #0.7
>>>> c d e f
>>>> }
>>>> %============
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd guess that this is because the centre lines of the 8 and clef line up.
>>> Do you have examples supporting your view?
>>
>> Nick Payne posted to the lilypond-user thread here:
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-01/msg00927.html
>>
>> commenting that there isn't a single value for X-offset that works for
>> all ottavations.
>
> Would it make sense to change the metrics of the clef glyphs until it
> does?
I wondered about a proper fix too.
I thought the unwanted interaction was between the clef and the various
ottava glyphs that Lilypond provides.
So, I would have thought, adjust (or specialise) the glyph that provides
the script "8".
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall