[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Add tempo spanners
Re: Add tempo spanners
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:43:33 +0000
mu4e 0.9.9.5-dev6; emacs 23.3.1
Xavier Scheuer writes:
> On 4 February 2013 16:01, Kieren MacMillan
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello all!
>> A few weeks ago, in response to Mike Solomon's call for features and bugs, I
>> posted a request:
>>>> 2. Allowing a text markup (especially a MetronomeMark) to have a "minimum
>>>> measure length". This would avoid collisions, particularly where there are
>>>> lots of multi-measure rests (e.g., orchestral parts).
>> His response was:
>>> #2 is doable via a hack. Minimum lengths can only work if you use
>>> spanners, but you can hijack the tempo print function for a text spanner
>>> (and suppress the line afterwards) and then create a scheme engraver for
>>> text spanner that uses whatever as the left bound and the next bar line's
>>> non-musical paper column as the right bound. Or you could just use the
>>> existing engraver and use the last note in the measure as a bound, although
>>> this will potentially create uneven spacing in a measure.
>>> You'll have to manually put this TextSpanner in the topmost context and/or
>>> use ly:side-position-interface::move-to-extremal-staff (I'd recommend the
>>> former, as the latter is powerful but falls in the category of LilyPond
>>> black magic). Make sure to use springs and rods and set a minimum-length -
>>> there's an example in the docs with a hairpin or glissando or something
>>> spanner-y that does this.
>> Is there anyone out there who can work on this with me? I've got some money
>> to put towards the implementation.
> It would be great to have a TempoTextSpanner, for example in order to
> handle common notation such as
> rit. - - - - a tempo
> rall - - - -
> I do not see this request tracked yet.
Thanks for the report, Xavier, but I think we already have this feature
in Lilypond, don't we? See:
which documents syntax such as:
\override TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text = "rit."
> Bug squad, could you add it?
I'm not clear on what you are proposing. Could you give an example of
the new syntax?
> Maybe Kieren or Mike could give a proper description.
OK, well, if Kieren, Mike or you could propose the syntax then we'll
have a complete feature request and sure, we can add it.