Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything

[Janek Warchoł]

Hi,

2013/6/22 Pavel Roskin <address@hidden>:
> It looks like you created an alternative to partcombine!  That's very
> impressive!

It's almost like implementing the partcombine logic in LilyPond itself :)

> But I wonder what limitations your approach has compared to
> partcombine.

as far as i know, the drawbacks are:
- you have to insert the commands eveerywhere inside the music source,
- you have to use different definitions of these commands in score and
parts.  It's quite easy to do this using includes.

>> Feel free to use this snippet as you wish :)
>
> I mean, we need something in Documentation/snippets.

ah, ok.  Indeed, that'd be useful.

> I might try to convert one of the scores from partcombine to your approach.

You may want to take a look at
https://github.com/janek-warchol/warsztat-nutowy/tree/master/epifania/Cantate%20Domino%20%28Miskinis%29
which was created by my fellow choir members - crowd-engraving at its
best :) 
(https://lilypondblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/04/crowd-engraving-whats-that-part-1/)

best,
Janek