[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR 1.4.1: inconsistency in the description of repeats and alternate
Re: NR 1.4.1: inconsistency in the description of repeats and alternate endings?
Wed, 10 Jul 2013 23:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Federico Bruni wrote:
>>> So I would rewrite the second sentence as:
>>> Multiple repeats with one alternate ending
>>> Does it make sense what I'm writing?
>> I believe, this isn't the right place for asking
>> questions. Would you like to formulate a bug report?
> Well, it is a bug report.
> As any bug report, it requires the confirmation from a
> person other than the "reporter".
> If you think it makes sense, please add it to the tracker.
> I would interpret the silence from developers and doc
> writers as an implicit ok.
Yes, Federico's suggested sentence is better. It is a
trivial patch to make, and can be done in a minute. I'm
still unclear if developers can start tracker issues, or if
that's only to be done by bug squad members. Let me