[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NR 1.4.1: inconsistency in the description of repeats and alternate
From: |
Marek Klein |
Subject: |
Re: NR 1.4.1: inconsistency in the description of repeats and alternate endings? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:34:04 +0200 |
Hello Federico,
2013/7/10 Federico Bruni <address@hidden>
> 2013/7/10 Marek Klein <address@hidden>
>
>> Hello Federico,
>>
>> 2013/7/6 Federico Bruni <address@hidden>
>>
>>> So I would rewrite the second sentence as:
>>>
>>> Multiple repeats with one alternate ending
>>>
>>> Does it make sense what I'm writing?
>>>
>>
>> I believe, this isn't the right place for asking questions. Wold you like
>> to formulate a bug report?
>>
>>
> Well, it is a bug report.
> As any bug report, it requires the confirmation from a person other than
> the "reporter".
> If you think it makes sense, please add it to the tracker. I would
> interpret the silence from developers and doc writers as an implicit ok.
>
in such a case there is no need for confirmation or discussion on bug-list.
The consideration takes place on the tracker itself...
Marek
bug squad member