[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken clef glyph
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: broken clef glyph |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:38:25 +0200 (CEST) |
Norbert, thanks for your help.
> If someone pings the Ubuntu maintainers they might pull from
> Debian/unstable, while they normally only pull from Debian/testing.
>
> For Fedora - I don't know, please contact the maintainers and ask
> them to build from branch tl2013 and not from the released sources,
> as there are important bug fixes.
Ubuntu, Fedora users, please do that!
> * OpenSuSE: I just checked
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Publishing:TeXLive/texlive
> and it seems that Werner uses texlive-20130620-source.tar.xz without
> any patches related to mf, so that means that OpenSuSE would ship
> broken mpost.
Reported as
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838374
Werner
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, (continued)
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive (was: broken clef glyph), Marek Klein, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, David Kastrup, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Colin Campbell, 2013/09/07
- Re: broken clef glyph, Norbert Preining, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Norbert Preining, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: broken clef glyph, Norbert Preining, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken clef glyph, David Kastrup, 2013/09/04