bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ambitus not in the beginning


From: Kai Lautenschläger
Subject: Re: Ambitus not in the beginning
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 22:15:40 +0100

Hi Patrick,

thanks for making that easier to see. Since I am not at all familiar with the 
procedure once a bug is named a bug (or at least believed to be one), my 
question would be: is there any ideas for a work-around? 

I was thinking to somehow manually put the ambitus at the beginning of a staff 
deliberately without having LP also write one (visible or not) at the end of 
the staff before. But that idea exceeds my knowledge of LP code or scheme by 
lightyears. :(

best regards,
Kai

Am 28.11.2013 um 22:07 schrieb pls <address@hidden>:

> On 25.11.2013, at 14:34, Kai Lautenschläger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> As you can see in the following not so tiny example inserting the ambitus 
>> makes the \RemoveEmptyStaves command ineffective.
> I reduced your example quite a bit and the problem is still there: 
> \RemoveEmptyStaves does not show any effect in staves containing voices in 
> which the ambitus engraver is added. AFAICS you are right and this is a bug.
> 
> \version "2.17.95"
> \score {
>   <<
>     \new Staff {
>       R1
>      \break
>      \new Voice 
>      % \with { \consists "Ambitus_engraver" } %uncomment this line to see the 
> effect
>        \relative { a'4 b c d }
>     }
>     \new Staff {
>       c'1
>       \break
>       \new Voice \with { \consists "Ambitus_engraver" }
>         \relative { a'4 b c d }
>     }
>   >>
> 
> \layout {
>   \context {
>     \Staff \RemoveEmptyStaves \override VerticalAxisGroup #'remove-first = ##t
>     }
>   }
> }
> 
> hth
> patrick


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]