Re: redundant entries in the indexes are confusing and lesseningthe clarity

[Federico Bruni]

2014/2/1 Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>

>
> James wrote Saturday, February 01, 2014 10:51 AM
>
>
> > On 01/02/14 10:14, Eluze wrote:
>
> >> add \single, \temporary \undo and  more to the index - is that worth an
> >> entry in the tracker!?
>
> > A tracker? I'd just create a patch and submit it (and create the tracker
> > with git-cl for that patch). Otherwise you are going to have to say
> > where you want the @cindex's specifically. Seems as you know how to make
> > a patch that you might as well do them and submit them yourself. I don't
> > think it is ever a bad idea to have index entries.
>
> I agree.
>

Whoever takes this task, please consider also @cindex \bookpart:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-06/msg00146.html