[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fwd: Question about the make check tests

From: James
Subject: Fwd: Question about the make check tests
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:52:07 +0000

sigh.. forgot to add bug.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James <address@hidden>
Date: 9 February 2014 13:51
Subject: Re: Question about the make check tests
To: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
Cc: Phil Holmes <address@hidden>, Developers List <


Taking dev off of this and moving to 'bug'

On 30 January 2014 11:21, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> James <address@hidden> writes:
> > On 22/01/14 18:16, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >>> Think it's worth putting this up as an Issue, so as not to lose it.
> >> Probably worth putting up as _9_ issues since tackling one in general
> >> will be independent from tackling another.
> >>
> > I haven't forgotten about this.
> >
> > I'll try and do it sometime today.
> I was going to say that most of them will spend not much more than 5-10
> minutes to fix anyway, but on second thought I am not sure about that:
> "programming error" indicates a message that should not be appearing in
> the first place, so it's not just a question of routing the regtest
> around the error: even if the regtest in itself is doing something bad,
> a "programming error" will not likely be an appropriate response.
> --
> David Kastrup

I'm about to start this - just in case the bug lists starts wondering what
is going on.

I'll do my best to see if I can see a related tracker, else I'll create a
new one myself at the same time.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]