[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Slur padding on dotted notes

From: James
Subject: Re: Slur padding on dotted notes
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:48:14 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 13/02/14 11:53, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "James" <address@hidden>
To: "Janek Warchoł" <address@hidden>; "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "LilyPond Bugreports" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Slur padding on dotted notes

On 12/02/14 18:50, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2014-02-12 13:17 GMT+01:00 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
"Urs Liska" <address@hidden> wrote in message
I agree with Jay, the slurs in the first bar of the second system are too
far away from the notes.


+1.  See attached: this happened between 15.18 and 15.21. Note how the
lower slurs are now better tho' - think this is Janek's doing?
Yes, mine and Keith's.

As for the change Jay reported, these two commits seem to be likely culprits:

commit fb79c584a99fe6571a23a9770efd6e1ede3a5772
Author: Mike Solomon <address@hidden>
Date:   Mon Dec 5 08:28:56 2011 +0100

     Adds Dots to the Slur encompass-objects grob set.

commit f6613d01ea86355ea5ce8598aac4352e11191b38
Author: Mike Solomon <address@hidden>
Date:   Fri Dec 2 08:17:32 2011 +0100

     Assures less overshoot in Slur::pure_height.


bug-lilypond mailing list
Do we need a tracker for this or append it to an existing one?


Probably easiest to create a new one.


Although I am hesitant to mark it as a 'regression' being that we did improve slurs in most other cases - so I'll leave that decision to those that know more than I.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]