Re: Errors running lilypond-book

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Daniel Rosen" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; 
<address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Daniel Rosen" <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Cc: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 2:29 PM
> > Subject: RE: Errors running lilypond-book
> >
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: David Kastrup [mailto:address@hidden
> > > > Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:08 PM
> > > > To: Daniel Rosen
> > > > Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
> > > > Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book
> > > >
> > > > Do you have the possibility to check whether the patch in
> > > > <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3874> would fix
> > > > the problem for you?
> > >
> > > Are you asking whether I have the ability to compile LilyPond from
> > > source? If you are, the answer is no, I unfortunately do not.
> >
> > You don't need to - it would be good enough to manually edit
> > book_latex.py in your bin directory.
>
> I am skeptical whether this would cause Python to recompile
> book_latex.pyc.
>
> --
> David Kastrup

Pretty certain it does: this is how I've experimented with the scripts in 
the past.

--
Phil Holmes