RE: Errors running lilypond-book

[Daniel Rosen]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Holmes [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:28 AM
> To: David Kastrup
> Cc: Daniel Rosen; address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Daniel Rosen" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>;
> <address@hidden>
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book
> 
> 
> > "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> Original Message -----
> >> From: "Daniel Rosen" <address@hidden>
> >> To: <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: <address@hidden>
> >> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 2:29 PM
> >> Subject: RE: Errors running lilypond-book
> >>
> >>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: David Kastrup [mailto:address@hidden
> >>>> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2014 3:08 PM
> >>>> To: Daniel Rosen
> >>>> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
> >>>> Subject: Re: Errors running lilypond-book
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have the possibility to check whether the patch in
> >>>> <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3874>
> would
> >>>> fix the problem for you?
> >>>
> >>> Are you asking whether I have the ability to compile LilyPond from
> >>> source? If you are, the answer is no, I unfortunately do not.
> >>
> >> You don't need to - it would be good enough to manually edit
> >> book_latex.py in your bin directory.
> >
> > I am skeptical whether this would cause Python to recompile
> > book_latex.pyc.
> >
> > --
> > David Kastrup
> 
> Pretty certain it does: this is how I've experimented with the scripts in the
> past.
> 
> --
> Phil Holmes

What changes need to be made, exactly? 

DR