[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New feature suggestion

From: David Nalesnik
Subject: Re: New feature suggestion
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:56:19 -0500

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:

> Knute Snortum <ksnortum <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Just my two cent's worth:
> >
> > Adding an "n" modifier isn't saying that C Sharp is C Natural, it's an
> > assertion.  "Yes, I really mean natural.  No, I didn't just forget the
> > sharp."
> That sounds like a benefit, but I would think that people who value
> "cn" for that reason would prefer a language definition that did not
> include plain "c", so that Lilypond would not even produce output
> based on such an error.
The "cn" would be used presumably to reflect the fact that the output will
have a natural sign.  Requiring that C in C major be notated as "cn"--if
I'm understanding you correctly--doesn't make sense.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]