[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180)
|
From: |
Keith OHara |
|
Subject: |
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 28 Dec 2014 07:24:37 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Trevor Daniels <t.daniels <at> treda.co.uk> writes:
> You could revert commit 586a6d331e22d0e1a255068f07c534d219c7c902 locally
I've boldly reverted the commit, removing those two regtests from staging
so we don't have build errors.
I suspect it is actually issue 4231 that caused the problem, because
4180 would give an error message that was not seen in Federico' log, and
should not have happened with the (now-removed) time-sig-single-digit.ly
- run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Federico Bruni, 2014/12/26
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Trevor Daniels, 2014/12/26
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Federico Bruni, 2014/12/26
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Keith OHara, 2014/12/27
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/27
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), Keith OHara, 2014/12/27
- Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/28
Re: run make doc without regtest? (issue 4180), David Kastrup, 2014/12/27