Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version

[David Kastrup]

Masamichi Hosoda <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi
>
> In lilypond current master branch, I found that
> input/regression/time-signature-numbered.ly
> and
> input/regression/time-signature-single-digit.ly
> files don't have ``\version''.
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?
> p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=8298bc08d2d6398af3b1c988b825ad36d355e7ee
>
> Then, GUB's ``make lilypond'' is failed.
> Here is a patch.
>
> ```
> --- a/input/regression/time-signature-numbered.ly     2015-02-19 
> 22:39:42.810909400 +0900
> +++ b/input/regression/time-signature-numbered.ly     2015-02-19 
> 22:40:59.826572000 +0900
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +\version "2.19.16"
> +
>  \header {
>    texidoc = "The numbered time signature style prints a fraction."
>  }
> --- a/input/regression/time-signature-single-digit.ly 2015-02-19 
> 22:37:58.662289400 +0900
> +++ b/input/regression/time-signature-single-digit.ly 2015-02-19 
> 22:41:15.639086900 +0900
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +\version "2.19.16"
> +
>  \header {
>    texidoc = "The single-digit time signature style prints the numerator 
> only."
>  }
> ```

Please submit git-formatted patches (including commit message) if
possible.

I pushed a fix to staging but could not make use of your patch.

Are you actually working on GUB currently?  We are obviously having some
problems getting 2.19.16 into gear at the moment.  While I've got Jan to
look at it sometime next week, it is a bad idea if we don't have any
active experts working with it.  So if we find someone willing to invest
some more time in getting GUB back to work with newer GCC versions, we'd
might manage to get unstuck.

-- 
David Kastrup