[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:53:55 -0000 |
Masamichi HOSODA wrote Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:59 AM
> I've fixed the issues I found.
>
> Therefore, in this branch,
> https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/gcc-4.9
> I've succeed GUB's ``make lilypond''.
> All lilypond installers have been built by gcc-4.9.2.
>
> In darwin-x86 (Intel Mac), mingw (Windows), linux-64, linux-x86, linux-ppc,
> freebsd-64, freebsd-x86):
> I've tested lilypond installer and lilypond - they work fine.
> Correct PDF is generated.
I've just had a look at your branch on:
https://github.com/trueroad/gub/network
That's an impressive set of patches over six months of hard work.
Congratulations! And many thanks for moving this on!
Trevor
- time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi Hosoda, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi Hosoda, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/19
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/23