[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly do
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:15:51 -0000 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Masamichi HOSODA" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>;
<address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and
time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version
I'm now getting an error shown in target/linux-x86/log/cross/gcc-core.log:
config.status: creating Makefile
config.status: creating testsuite/Makefile
config.status: creating config.h
config.status: executing default commands
Command barfed: cd
/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-x86/build/cross/gcc-core-4.9.2 &&
make -j16
tooldir='/home/gub/NewGub/gub/target/linux-x86/root/usr/cross/i686-linux'
gcc_tooldir='/usr/i686-linux' all-gcc all-target-libgcc
Not sure this is very helpful as an error message, but I can't find another.
--
Phil Holmes
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, (continued)
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/20
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/20
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/21
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Trevor Daniels, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly andtime-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, David Kastrup, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version,
Phil Holmes <=
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/22
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/23
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/24
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/24
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Masamichi HOSODA, 2015/02/24
- Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/24
- GUB updates: was: Re: time-signature-single-digit.ly and time-signature-single-digit.ly don't have \version, Phil Holmes, 2015/02/25