bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond 2.19.20 on fedora gs bug


From: Jon Ciesla
Subject: Re: lilypond 2.19.20 on fedora gs bug
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 13:46:01 -0500

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Martin Tarenskeen <address@hidden>
wrote:

>   so why is it not failing with Fedora 21? Fedora 21 and 22 use the same
> Pango version?
>
> MT
>
> On 29 mei 2015 2:05:16 PM Jon Ciesla <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Masamichi HOSODA <
>> address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> > The Fedora 22 package fails for everyone, the www.lilypond.org version
>>> > works.
>>> >
>>> > I tried this minimal example:
>>> >
>>> > % f22test.ly
>>> > \version "2.19.21"
>>> > {c'}
>>> >
>>> > And then did
>>> >
>>> > $ lilypond --ps --verbose f22.ly &> f22test1.txt
>>> > $ ps2pdf14 f22test.ps f22test.pdf &> f22test2.txt
>>> >
>>> > results: see attachment.
>>> > f22test1.txt f22test2.txt f22test.ps
>>>
>>> Thank you for your files.
>>>
>>> I suspect an issue of pango package of fedora 22.
>>>
>>> First, I've tried your f22test.ps on my environment with gs-9.15.
>>> It is failed. That is, it is not gs-9.16's issue.
>>> The result is following.
>>>
>>> ```
>>> $ ps2pdf14 f22test.ps f22test.pdf
>>> Error: /undefinedresult in --glyphshow--
>>> Operand stack:
>>>    0.6146   5.6906   -2.8453   space
>>> Execution stack:
>>>    %interp_exit   .runexec2   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
>>>  --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push   --nostringval--   --nostringval--
>>>  --nostringval--   false   1   %stopped_push   1967   1   3   %oparray_pop
>>>  1966   1   3   %oparray_pop   1950   1   3   %oparray_pop   1836   1   3
>>>  %oparray_pop   --nostringval--   %errorexec_pop   .runexec2
>>>  --nostringval--   --nostringval--   --nostringval--   2   %stopped_push
>>>  --nostringval--   0   --nostringval--   %repeat_continue   --nostringval--
>>> Dictionary stack:
>>>    --dict:1186/1684(ro)(G)--   --dict:0/20(G)--   --dict:108/200(L)--
>>> Current allocation mode is local
>>> Last OS error: No such file or directory
>>> Current file position is 131424
>>> GPL Ghostscript 9.15: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> Then, I've found problems of f22test.ps.
>>> Broken f22test.ps sets font size to zero.
>>> Using the patch file for f22test.ps that is attached to this mail,
>>> ps2pdf14 is succeed.
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly, LilyPond gets the font size from pango.
>>> www.lilypond.org version LilyPond bundles pango that has no problem,
>>> and always uses it.
>>>
>>> Fedora 22's packaged LilyPond uses fedora 22's packaged pango?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> bug-lilypond mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
>>>
>>> Yes, it does.  I'll add the above to the bug report and reassign to
>> pango.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> in your fear, seek only peace
>> in your fear, seek only love
>>
>> -d. bowie
>>
>
Interesting.  They do use the same pango version, only the ghostscript
version differs.

-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]