[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Aw: Re: Several notation errors in bagpipe.ly

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: Several notation errors in bagpipe.ly
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 10:48:18 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 6/7/15 9:45 AM, "Federico Bruni" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>Thanks Oliver
>>The correct email address is address@hidden
>>The normal procedure is that the Bug Squad will open a new issue in the
>>tracker if the errors are confirmed.
>>I cannot comment on the changes proposed, sine I don't know anything
>>about bagpipe music. I hope others will.
> I cannot comment on the changes either, but it seems like we have an
> expert opinion that the changes are correct.

The main question we need to address then is whether there is reasonable
suspicion that people relied on the previous behavior, possibly by
figuring out the names of commands to use by looking at the charts.

Are any users of bagpipe.ly known/reachable with whom we could discuss
how to proceed for making this change?  Are convert-ly rules advisable?
Or is it more likely that existing music would actually get closer to
the writer's actual musical intent?

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]