[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Skip between \marks will be ignored
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Skip between \marks will be ignored |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jul 2015 22:34:15 +0200 |
2015-07-01 21:54 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>:
> Hello,
>
> If there are only skips (s) between two \mark commands, these will be
> ignored, a warning given about simultaneous marks, and everything following
> in this (input) music expression will not be engraved. It boils down to the
> following:
>
> \version "2.19.22"
> % same with 2.18
>
> %{
>
> The problem:
> Warning about Two simultaneous mark events &c.
> All the following music will be junked
>
> Test cases:
>
> Same duration – \default given – problem
> Same duration – \default not given – no problem
> Different durations – \default given – problem
> Different durations – \default not given – problem
>
> %}
>
> {
> \mark
> s4
> \mark \default
> s
> }
>
> I submitted Issue 4472
> <https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4472>, but wanted to
> ‘announce’ it here also. It’s quite confusing that it interferes with
> \default given or not, isn’t it?
>
> Best regards, Simon
The mark-function needs an argument, see:
#(display mark)
This code: { \mark s4 \mark \default s4 } puts in s4 as the argument
for the first \mark.
Besides it's nonsense, you then have two simultaneous marks.
For this code: { \mark \default s4 \mark \default s4 } be aware that
SkipEvents do not create a NoteColumn.
Meaning both RehearsalMarks try to align themselves to the same item,
as given with the 'break-align-symbols'-property.
At least this is my understanding.
Thus I see no bug here.
Cheers,
Harm