Re: 2.19.22 not building

[Thomas Spuhler]

On Friday, July 10, 2015 12:28:53 AM you wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler <address@hidden> writes:
> > I am the packager of Lilypond for Mageia.
> > Unfortunately, version 2.19.22 doesn't build, 2.19.21 did.
> > Is there a new BuildRequirement for vers. 2.19.22?
> > The bug I get is:
> > cd ./out &&
> > /home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.22/scripts/build/out/run-and-check
> > "/home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.22/out/bin/lilypond 
> > --verbose
> > /home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.22/ly/generate-documentation"
> >  "generate-
> > documentation.log"
> > 
> > Please check the logfile generate-documentation.log for errors
> > 
> > GNUmakefile:295: recipe for target 'out/internals.texi' failed
> > make[1]: *** [out/internals.texi] Error 1
> > 
> > The generate-documentation.log shows this:
> > 
> > [/home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.22/out/share/lilypond/current/ly/engraver-
> > init.ly/home/spuhler/MageiaSVN/lilypond/BUILD/lilypond-2.19.22/out/share/lilypond/current/scm/li
> > ly.scmBacktrace:> 
> > In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> >  157: 14 [catch #t #<catch-closure 2d660c0> ...]
> > 
> > In unknown file:
> >    ?: 13 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 2d660c0>]
> > 
> > In ice-9/eval.scm:
> >  411: 12 [eval # #]
> >  432: 11 [eval # #]
> > 
> > In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> >  619: 10 [for-each #<procedure 4375090 at ice-9/eval.scm:416:20 (a)> #]
> > 
> > In ice-9/eval.scm:
> ice-9/eval.scm is a file from GUILE 2.0.  LilyPond requires compilation
> with GUILE 1.8.8.  LilyPond would not even have made it across the
> configure stage with GUILE 2.0 without particular options and care, and
> it never would have run.  So I doubt that there is something new with
> LilyPond that is causing a problem for you.  Either this never worked in
> this manner, or the person responsible for getting it to run previously
> should immediately report for duty at LilyPond central since over _here_
> GUILE 2.0 is still an unsolved problem.

David, version 2.19.21 actually built. I haven't done any testing, but will.

There is a strong push for Guile 2 from our community (lilypond being the last 
package still 
requiring? guile-1.8
So I need strong arguments for no using guile-2 such as the package is not 
working.


-- 
Best regards
Thomas Spuhler

All of my e-mails have a valid digital signature
ID 60114E63

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.