[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Allura at SF is ready

From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: Allura at SF is ready
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:00:59 +0100

James, you wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:47 PM

> Some comments if I may be so bold.

Of course - most welcome!
> 1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
> hand side panel) for each of the Patch states
> New
> Review
> Countdown
> Push

Presumably you'd like these restricted to status:Started?  Otherwise you'll see 
lots of status:Verified, Abandoned, etc.  Anyway, that's what I've done - 
easily changed though.

These are the four Patch( ... ) searches.

Open(Patch) now shows all the Started issues with a non-zero patch field.  
Useful for finding issues with incorrectly set fields.  As a dev you can fix 
these.  It also includes the needs_work, abandoned, and waiting patch states.

> The 'Fixed' search

This shows all the patches waiting to be Verified.  Useful for the bug squad.
> 2. It seems that the 'Needs' field is mandatory and this is going to be
> misleading I think. For example if you look at the new issue I entered
> manually:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4576/
> This has a 'Needs: design' tag which is inappropriate (and incorrect).

I've defined " " as the default for this field; should be OK for new issues 
now.  That also reminded me to define defaults for other fields too.
> Otherwise it seems simple enough.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]