bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: slurs and articulation


From: Trevor Daniels
Subject: Re: slurs and articulation
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:40:35 +0100

Martin Tarenskeen wrote Monday, August 31, 2015 10:50 AM

> Try to compile the following example:
> 
> %%%%
> 
> \version "2.19.25"
> 
> \relative {
>   d''-.( d-. d-. d-.)
>   d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
>   d--( d-- d-- d--)
>   d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
>   d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
>   d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
>   d->( d-> d-> d->)
>   \break
>   \override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #500
>   d-.( d-. d-. d-.)
>   d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
>   d--( d-- d-- d--)
>   d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
>   d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
>   d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
>   d->( d-> d-> d->)
> }
> 
> %%%%
> 
> Why are the articulations in bars 2, 7, 9, 14 treated differently? It 
> seems they are aligned with the slurs instead of the notes. Should I 
> forward this to bug-lilypond?

It does look somewhat inconsistent.

The properties of the various articulations (Script objects)
are defined in scm/script.scm.  Maybe one or two are sub-optimal.

Copying to bug list for further discussion.

Trevor

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]